Health Populi

Friday, November 2, 2007

Target marketing: no pink guns left behind?

In 2004, 20% of homicides were directly associated with intimate partner conflict (i.e., one in which an intimate partner killed another partner). Intimate partner violence resulting in death was most common among victims aged 40-44 years.

Murder is the leading cause of death for pregnant women, according to the National Organization of Women.

The National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, spends about $43 million a year on ways to reduce deaths and injuries from drowning, poisoning, suicide, industrial accidents, house fires and domestic violence. Of that sum, only $2.3 million (5% of the prevention budget) has been used to study the medical consequences of the use of firearms in the United States.

In my city of Philadelphia, a third policeman was shot this week. He has died from the gunshot to his head.

Kids in my daughter's suburban middle school are banned this year from wearing "hoodies" (i.e., hooded sweatshirts) because of concerns that the children will smuggle guns or knives into the school.

Now, answer me this: is the above picture a "toy" that a five-year-old girl, fond of toys in pink boxes, might pick up and play with?

No, it's a pink Taurus Millenium Pro 9mm Semi-Auto Pistol sold exclusively by Gander Mountain, self-described as an "outdoor lifestyle retailer." The retailer has launched a line of firearms targeted (sorry) to women. Does this come under the heading Pretty in Pink?

Not unless you think that the latest firearms statistics on women dying from gunshot wounds belong in Vogue magazine. But the way Gander Mountain describes the marketing strategy, guns are a fashion item, not a health risk.


"The latest craze for the hunting enthusiast is now in a bold new color – pink. In addition to the traditional firearm hues, Gander Mountain stores are now selling an exclusive line of firearms that come in the hot new color for all things outdoor," the company enthuses.

The Gander Mountain's press release rationalizes that, "While the male sector of the hunting community may stick to more muted colors, the new pink firearms have been welcomed by those who want to add a feminine touch to their shooting practice."

Furthermore, Gander Mountain contends that women shooters are a fast-growing segment of "outdoor customers." Gander Mountain says that, "a 20 GA pink shotgun first hit the shelves last year and sales were strong enough that Gander Mountain decided to add a wider selection of pink firearms."
It's not just a trend among women, but girls, too; the company notes that they are seeing more and more girls attending hunter safety courses with their parents. "Girls are actively participating in family hunting traditions, but some may want to have a little more fun with it by getting a pink shotgun," the company observes. Take that, Barbie!

The Remington 870 Junior 20 gauge pink shotgun, shown on the right, is made "specifically for a young beginner." This week it is on sale with a $30 rebate at Gander Mountain for $369.99 and comes with a free matching pink hat. The gun bears a slogan: "Shoot like a girl if you can!"

Health Populi's Hot Points: Read the Brady campaign's report, No Gun Left Behind. Then tell me if we need pink shotguns. Perhaps next October '08, Gander Mountain will promote a pink-guns-for-breast-cancer-awareness tie-in.

9 Comments:

  • As an outsider (Canadian) with many American friends that are firmly wed to your gun culture, I find myself at oddly conflicted when I am down visiting and someone says, "Hey, let's go to the range and shoot!". It can be an entertaining thing to do, and the group (mainly military and ex-military) practices range and firearms safety to a degree that absolutely alleviates any concerns that I may have.

    It is interesting to note that one of the best shots of that core group is a 10 year old girl, with her own, customized AR-15, and yes it too is pink.

    It is not uncommon when I have been down there visiting to see entire families on the range; it is a part of your society's culture, just like baseball, fireworks, hot dogs and apple pie.

    How the anti-firearm and the pro-firearm factions in the US handle the debate is interesting to watch, if you are an outside observer. Both have valid points, and the removal of firearms, while reducing impulse homicides, does not end homicides. Humans being humans will commit murders, they always have and always will.

    It is possible to have a society with a high proportion of firearms available, and not have gun-crime issues to the degree that the US has; Switzerland springs to mind.

    The debate will rage on; changes will be incremental, where they are not cosmetic. With gun ownership enshrined in your constitution, and a culture that emphasizes individualism and all that entails, it is extremely unlikely that any substantive changes can occur. But I wish you well in your fight; everyone needs a windmill to tilt at.

    Regards,

    Mark

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At November 2, 2007 9:12 AM  

  • Hey, great to see this. My 17 year old niece will be shopping for a carry gun next year; I'll have to recommend that.

    Wonder if I can find a pink-stocked Ruger 10/22 for her to use for her rifle competitions.

    OK, let me take my tongue out of my cheek for a second.

    Yes, I will be looking for a rifle for my niece for her 18th birthday. She already shoots but uses my rifles. No, it probably won't be pink, but it will be capable of 4 minutes of angle or less... and she'll need that accuracy.

    Mark, if you want to see that it's possible to have "a society with a high proportion of firearms available" and not have crime, you may want to read John Lott's book More Guns, Less Crime where he shows that concealed carry laws allowing law-abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons actually drives the crime rate DOWN. One needs only to look at such crime-free cities such as Chicago, Washington DC and London, England to see the results of total gun bans.

    By Anonymous Ross, At November 2, 2007 12:30 PM  

  • http://olegvolk.net/gallery/d/2779-4/pinkrifles0511.jpg

    http://olegvolk.net/gallery/d/2757-4/supportive4836.jpg

    I suppose my daughter terrifies you, then.

    She's the ten year old mentioned above. She shoots better than most of the infantrymen I've trained.

    In my professional opinion, she's safer on the range with 200 people with firearms than on the street on her bike.

    By Blogger Mike, At November 2, 2007 9:14 PM  

  • My daughter enjoys shooting .22 rifle, and it is a healthy and beneficial sport.


    I happen to think grown men whacking golf balls with big metal sticks is quite alarming, and football is positively barbaric, but that's just me. And Thomas Jefferson.

    In the book by
    John R. Bumgarner,The Health of the Presidents: The 41 United States Presidents Through 1993 from a Physician's Point of View. Jefferson, NC: MacFarland & Company, 1994


    Bumgarner quotes at length from a letter in which Jefferson gave his views onphysical fitness Jefferson encouraged exercise, walking and shooting most of all, observing: "Games played with the ball and others of that nature are too violent for the body."

    By Blogger Henry, At November 14, 2007 11:45 AM  

  • As a resident of London for 25 years I am always surprised that the high level of crime here, (so I read), is used to justify the carrying of firearms for self-defense by Americans. In the wrong parts of town here you may get mugged or possibly knifed but a shooting is still headline news...tens rather than tens thousands of people are shot here each year. (The last stat I remember was 13 deaths from firearms in the UK in 1992, with the US at 23,000 plus - the size of a small town - it is probably nearer 2 a week now.)
    There can be some form of gun control without having to build barricades. However, it seems that any form of debate on this issue in the US becomes hysterical very quickly, a great tactic for making sure nothing happens, given the craven nature of politicians with few principals other than to get elected...
    I own shotguns for pheasant shooting but it is highly regulated and you tend to be very discreet transporting guns to your automobile. The police issue me a license every 5 years and the guns must be stored in a secure case. What is my inconvenience compared to the limitation of firearms - I would find it near impossible to get a rifle. Freedoms have to be weighed against the greater good, which I suggest may include the control of access to firearms. (The right to bear arms clearly refers to the states...and besides constitutions can change, they seem to get ignored often enough!)

    PS There is now a Swiss campaign to prevent the Swiss army members having guns at home, as there is a woman shot every with government firearms. Still I suppose a citizen army needs to be in a state of permanent readiness...

    By Blogger ROBERT, At November 29, 2007 1:45 PM  

  • Regardless of the color of the hand held weapon, they ALL look like toys, unfortunately. So, give that point a rest.

    What is the difference between a 13 year old girl taking hunter's safety class or a 13 year old boy?

    What is the difference between a girl going shooting with her father and a girl going to hockey practice....except at hockey practice the teammates can "check" her?

    Who am I more affraid of: A 13 year old girl who has been practicing shooting with her 20 ga. And, who knows in reality what can happen when an object (or human) gets hit with a real shell; or, the boy with the raging testosterone who is sitting in his bedroom for 5 hours a day playing one of the many human hunt and kill games....you know the ones, the ones that get them so whipped up with anger that they need to shot their parents and their classmates too because they have been oh so wronged? Which of those are you afraid of most? I choose the latter. That child hiding behind the safety of the remote, does not know myth from reality when it comes to firearms until its way too late. Remember Dungeons and Dragons? Ya, same thing...except multiply it by about a thousand.

    In addition, I am a 41 year old female who just recently learned to shoot a 20 ga for sport. And, recently needed to protect my barn cats from a fairly large rabid raccoon...which, incidentally had taken more than 5 of my trusty cats and kittens in the last year. I would not hesitate for a second to do it again. It's called protecting my family (thank God it was ONLY the cats I was protecting and not my kids...who happened to be indoors at the time) and my "flock". Should I have gone into hiding until my spouse came home? What message does that send to my girls....be weak, be afraid, be dependent on a man. What is wrong with women being empowered to defend themselves, their property or their families? is it only the big strong man that can do that?

    And, perhaps if some of the missing women who unfortunately met with an untimely death, while pregnant, in the hands of their spouse, significant other, etc. had been carrying a firearm....maybe, just maybe, they and the babies they carried would be alive today.

    Last I heard, in the past several years its not been the girls who have killed classmates, killed their parents as they lay sleeping or watching TV, or who have savagely attacked the 4 year old baby next door....it was a boy, and usually those boys were video game masters.....not expert 20 ga. marksmen.

    Is it likely that my girl will be able to conceal her 20 ga. as I drive her to school or as she gets on the bus? ahhh...probably not. And, how likely will it be that she will get ALL 5 shells out of the chamber of the 20 ga. pump shotgun before someone overtakes her as she tries to mow down all that are in the lunchroom? How ridiculous is THAT??? Seriously....

    It takes "balls" to let a woman into your sport....not to keep her out.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At August 14, 2008 1:34 PM  

  • First let me say thanks to the responses I read to this thread. It's nice to see people who can express their concerns and ideas in a positive, educated manner. I think this is what it all really boils down to...education.
    I was brought up in a rural environment here guns have a feasible use in our day to day activities and I was educated at an early age to respect them and operate them safely. These are fundamentals that many people lack. This is why I understand that many people fear guns and speak out against them.
    I have been working in law enforcement since '95, and never had an experience in which shooting or being shot at was the case. These things are portrayed in the news and television as happening everyday to officers in the line of duty. My dad served nearly 32 years in law enforcement and was never shot at or had to shoot at anyone. If you live in a place where shootings occur frequently, I'd suggest moving to a different area. There are jobs and opportunities elsewhere I assure you.
    Fact of the matter is, I have pink guns in my home. They belong to my wife and my daughter and are part of a family training program we have in our home. I continue the tradition that my father taught me to use them safely and respect the power they posess. I also teach my girls to be able to defend themselves when I am away; and take comfort in doing so.
    If you take issue with guns, find out why and work past it as you would with any other fear or problem. Seek a reasonable solution and use your efforts to help fix it.
    In my time, I've seen many automobile accidents and fatalities. This is why I will write a ticket for seat-belts, failure to secure your child in a car seat, and help at DUI checkpoints to ensure safe drivers are just that. I would never take action against the automakers, DMV, or road workers. That's just the wrong logic. Take a shooting course, or a hunter safety course. There are lots of responsible people out there just waiting to help.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At October 9, 2008 9:47 AM  

  • You mentioned "what next, pink breast cancer gun?" Well, actually, yes.

    A pink semi-automatic rifle is being auctioned to benefit breast cancer research on GunBroker.com. My friend, Susan, is walking the Breast Cancer 3-Day, and her husband easily convinced DPMS Panther Arms to donate this pink rifle for the cause. The rifle retails for $795, but within a week of posting this, the bid is now over $3000, (we even had a link to the MSRP!!).

    Our gun guys are a generous group when it comes to charitable causes, and I am very proud of them.

    http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=112670834

    By Anonymous Adriana, At October 17, 2008 2:55 PM  

  • My daughter has been shooting for about 2 years. She began plinking as soon as she could recite the 4 rules of gun safety from memory, and also hold my Ruger Mark II pistol safely in her little hands. She's almost 8 now, and is a better shot with small caliber pistols and rifles than either of her older brothers. She's justifiably proud of her skill, and has never even skirted the possibility of handling a firearm in a way that would be considered unsafe.

    When I send my "little girl" to college, it will be with a Springfield XD9 and a concealed carry permit. My goal is to teach her to be an intelligent, creative thinker, a strong woman who demands respect. I am also actively teaching her NOT to be a victim.

    Citing the Brady Campaign to support your anti-gun agenda is like citing the NRA for the opposite argument. The Brady Campaign was formed with the express purpose of disarming Americans. If you can find any statistics to show that people from law-abiding gun-owning households somehow are in greater danger (in terms of accidental/unintential deaths vs. lives saved due to successful use of guns in personal protection), I'd love to hear it.

    I'm pretty sure the Brady people can cite chapter and verse about how awful guns are, but frankly, I'm not buying it.

    By Anonymous davethe10r, At September 8, 2009 7:03 PM  

Post a Comment



<< Home