"Health Consumers" and the hype cycle

In the area of health, IBM points to consumers' eroding trust in food safety. However, in its press release on the Omni Consumer, health care is not a major feature.
The IBM analysts are smart (or lucky). If this is an oversight, then it's providence; if it's an explicit omission, it's spot-on.
In my work and research, I remain unconvinced that Americans are truly behaving as health care consumers. Nor do I believe they want to embrace that role...yet. Notwithstanding the pronouncements of Ivy League professors in business bestsellers and human resource consultants, we may be on the road to consumerism in health care. But in the Trip-Tik, we're on page 2.
It's not that consumers don't like to shop; do we, ever, as IBM's analysis points out. Two key areas that will help support consumer-directed health are the facts that: (1) consumers are increasingly interested in doing it for themselves, as IBM points to the growing use of self-service technologies; and, (2) Internet and social networks are influencing buying decisions. We're in the pioneering phase of the latter in health, but a passionate group of patients and health advocates are doing some amazing things. Still, it's early days (Trip-Tik, page 4 for those "consumers").
A third aspect of IBM's research speaks generally to insurers failing to connect with patients. It appears that this data point relates more to property and casualty than to health insurance, but I'll go out on a very short limb to observe that health plans still have a long way to go to becoming beloved vendors to consumers.
I'll use Gartner's Hype Cycle to explain my take on the current status of consumer-driven health (CDH).
1. Technology Trigger
We are now between phases (2) and (3), as follows:
2. Peak of Inflated Expectations
3. Trough of Disillusionment
4. Slope of Enlightenment
5. Plateau of Productivity
Health Populi's Hot Points: At this point in the consumer-directed health care Hype Cycle, it's important to realistically segment Americans into true health care consumers, consumers-lite, and committed couch potatoes. There are obviously terrific segmentation tools in the marketplace, and vendors to the industry should use these. But keep in my the hype versus the real.
4 Comments:
Jane,
You are correct in pointing out the hype over consumer directed healthcare.
However, I want to point out that Part D is providing an unexpectedly positive example of how consumer involvement can lower costs.
Seniors now have strong incentives to keep their total drug costs below the lower end of the donut hole. As a result, more seniors are trying to get the biggest bang for their buck by accepting generic substitution as well as shopping around at pharmacies.
I discuss the details on my blog: Part D and Generics.
Adam
By
Adam J. Fein, At
December 18, 2007 8:34 AM
Adam, I enjoy your blog. RE: seniors and generics, the PBMs and plans are aggressively pushing seniors toward generics given "incentives." I think it's a big chicken-and-egg -- the generics are incredibly less expensive, to the chagrin of Big Pharma. I don't know how much "shopping around" there actually is in this scenario, but your point is well-taken! Be well, JSK
By
Jane Sarasohn-Kahn, At
December 18, 2007 5:39 PM
Hey Jane! I love your application of the Hype Cycle here, but aren’t you at risk of defining consumerism in the health space too narrowly?
What about these signs of the increasing health consumerism?
1. More and More People Are Going Online for Health Info. Pew has the number of consumers asking searching for health online at 113 million.
2. They Getting Saavier in their Use of the Internet for Health. The Harris poll you cited last week: “9 out of 10 Americans dealing with a health decision want to consult additional sources beyond the doctor's opinion.”
3. And Some Are Way Ahead of the Curve. Anecdotally, a vanguard of consumers are aggressively pushing the medical research envelope. I haven’t seen numbers on this, but I wrote a blog on some of the Wall Street Journal’s recent coverage of aggressive health consumers.
My point is that I think we’re going through a real sea change in consumer attitude around health right now. (The browser happens to be a very easy way to express that.) What do you think? Jude
By
heyjudeseattle, At
December 19, 2007 9:47 PM
Jude, your examples of more signposts of consumerism are sound. As a forecaster, I only counsel for moderation when predicting the pace of change...and not that in the diffusion of new concepts, per the guru Ev Rogers, the vanguard-adopters have to do the heavy-lifting in the marketplace of the new-new. Thanks for sharing your observations! JSK
By
Jane Sarasohn-Kahn, At
December 20, 2007 5:20 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home