A new snapshot of health consumerism from EBRI and The Commonwealth Fund

There appears to be an uptick in satisfaction among CDHP members, although these members are not more satisfied with their plans than those in more comprehensive health plans.
There remains the challenge that people in these plans are more likely to skip care. The chart on the right shows that members of CDHPs and HDHPs are more likely to delay going to a doctor, visit a specialist, or undergo medical tests than members of comprehensive plans.
Information for decision making is still lacking in consumer driven plans, notwithstanding consumers' need for such data on provider quality, pricing and options. CDHPs and HDHPs don't provide any more data than comprehensive health plans do...but they certainly should.

Clearly, members of consumer driven plans are more cost-sensitive than those in traditional plans, and that's been a rationale for them -- the objective of giving consumers "more skin in the (health care) game."
Health Populi's Hot Points: According to the EBRI/Commonwealth Fund data, enrollment in CDHPs doubled between 2006 and 2007 -- from 1% to 2% of the privately-insured population. This population tends to be wealthier and healthier than the mainstream. This was not necessarily the original objective of CDHPs, which have been seen as an important offering to cover the uninsured.
Furthermore, for members to be true consumers, the plans will have to provide a great deal more useful information for members to use in decision making. Exposing more of the consumer's skin in health care without providing useful information is leaving them out in the sun to get burnt. People need information with the proper SPF -- Supportive, Practical, Functional.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home