Health Populi

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Most Americans see US health system negatively; savings and household finances pinched by health costs


Rising costs continue to change the way Americans use the health care system.

That's the tagline for the 2008 Health Confidence Survey published by the Employee Benefits Research Institute (EBRI), released October 7.

Cost increases over the past year have directly changed health care consumers' behaviors in the system. 74% of people choose generic drugs over brands, compared to 60% in 2007. 63% of people talk to the doctor about treatment options and costs, versus 53% in 2007. And, most alarmingly, 62% of Americans go the doctor only for "more serious conditions or symptoms," compared to 48% last year.

EBRI also found that among Americans whose costs have increased in the past year, 29% decreased contributions to a retirement plan, and 54% decreased contributions to other savings accounts. 27%
used up all or most of their savings, 22% increased credit card debt, and 15% borrowed money to pay for health costs.

Health Populi's Hot Points: There was a pivotal moment in last night's rather tepid Presidential debate when Tom Brokaw, the moderator, asked the two Senators, "Is health care a privilege, a right, or a responsibility?" Senator McCain quickly responded, "A responsibility." Senator Obama asserted, "It's a right."

The EBRI data accumulated for more than a decade demonstrates that there is a direct relationship between health care costs and a consumer's use of the system. This year, 42% of Americans are not confident they'll be able to afford health care without financial hardship, compared with 31% who felt that way in 2002.

Forbes magazine points out this week that the idea of health care as a right comes out of the 1948 Universal Declaration for Human Rights. Six decades later, Obama has asserted that should be the case for all Americans.

3 Comments:

  • I read your blog article about stress and the economic circumstances and healthcare issues.

    As a UK citizen I have just watched the second Presidential Debate. I was intrigued by the question is healthcare a “responsibility, entitlement or right” and could not resist responding to your blog which I know is read by many European healthcare providers and businesses – note the socialized medicine terminology!

    At 17% of GDP the US is clearly spending way too much for a failing system of healthcare provision. Far from perfect, the UK spends the European average on healthcare (the majority of which is socialized) at 8% with better outcomes than the US. (However, some 30% of the recent increases in expenditure go on the pensions of the retired National Health Service workers. Similarly many US Corporations, which all retirees depend on for income, spend vast amounts of income on former workers.) I see two worlds – Public Sector and major corporation retirees with inflation-proofed final-salary pensions and healthcare and the rest of us – in Europe the healthcare free at the point of delivery.

    How will America find more money for healthcare when your major corporations, including pharmaceutical companies are expected to subsidize their own and the public sector workforce? The solution cannot be increasing the proportion of GDP spent on healthcare with so many other problems in the economy and the shifting demographics…or making business pay more. It has to be a different model.

    On what I saw this evening I am not sure either candidate is really ready to address the scale of the problem…Healthcare funding is a problem for the entire western world, as no one is facing up this in Europe either…

    I suggest the industry tries to develop a new model - any takers?

    By Anonymous Robert Pay, At October 8, 2008 5:31 PM  

  • Healthcare as privilege, right, or responsibility?

    Who said the answers need to be mutually exclusive?

    By Blogger Vince Kuraitis, At October 8, 2008 6:55 PM  

  • Jane - I really enjoyed hearing you speak here in Michigan at the Blue Cross Blue Shield Key Producer Conference.

    As a health insurance broker in the US, I have grown frustrated with the process of health care financing at all levels. And, even more frustrated with the policital positions of either party as neither position will fix the issue as Robert Pay pointed out. He is correct. The magnitude of the issue is far beyond either candidate or country for that matter.

    Senator Obama's point that health care is a right misunderstands that lack of responsibility that soon follows by the individual presented with such a right thereby magnifying the issue. A system that mearly fixes the outcome of poor personal lifestyle choices only breads irresponsibility in the many.

    Senator McCain's point that health care responsibility misses the point of creating an environment of fair play from an underwriting/financing and provision of care for the protection of the individual. The concrete financial products to fix this issue have not been allowed to be created by the IRS and cannot be controled by the insurance industry.

    The solution will take a new model in which the capital of the human worker is captured, preserved, partially subsidized and managed from birth to death as best it can. This will require a combination of free market and government initiatives. This new industry will drive the new economy over the net 20 years - about the same time as America took to convert from the horse to the automobile.


    Looking forward to the election and the new opportunites to fix this issue over the next 20 years.

    Justin Spewock

    By Anonymous Justin Spewock, At October 24, 2008 11:21 AM  

Post a Comment



<< Home