Health Populi

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Affordable care and better information: what Americans want from a new-and-improved US health system


Anxiety about health care costs tops American citizens' concerns about health care in the U.S. Rich, poor, insured or un-, 2 in 3 Americans worry about the affordability of health care in America.

So it follows, then, that among those without health insurance, 57% blame their uninsured state on the fact that they simply cannot afford it, as shown in the table on the right. Beyond this group, 30% of the uninsured cite the employer's role in health insurance: 14% aren't employed, 9% have employers who don't offer coverage, and 7% are "between jobs."

These findings come from Accenture's report, The American Public on Health Care: The Missing Perspective, which sets out the major concerns of Americans and their views on reforming the U.S. health system. The report aggregates results from national and local Gallup polls, along with town hall meeting input from citizens in Detroit, Miami and San Francisco.

The middle aged are the most concerned about cost. 56% of Americans ages 40 to 64 cite cost as the top most concerning health issue; 47% of younger and older Americans put cost as #1.

This survey echoes what others I've written about here have addressed: the problem of putting off medical treatment due to lack of affordability. 1 in 4 Americans (26%) in this poll say they've done so, which includes 58% of those who are uninsured. But even 20% of the insured have put off treatment because they couldn't afford the out-of-pocket costs.


The second major finding in this study is that Americans see information as a powerful force in addressing quality and efficiency in U.S. health care. Citizens are seeking very specific kinds of information about providers -- both physicians and hospitals -- to help them navigate the complex health system. The chart on the left inventories the kinds of data citizens seek about doctors and hospitals, including but not limited to:

- Records of medical errors
- Whether the provider follows guidelines and standards
- Patient satisfaction survey results.

Furthermore, most Americans see the benefit of sharing their personal health data. 78% favor giving physicians access to their medical records, and 2 in 3 see value in submitting their data into an anonymized database for mining clinical effectiveness information.

This initiative was convened through a collaboration between the Council for Excellence in Government, the Accenture Institute for Public Service Value and the Institute of Medicine at the National Academies.

Health Populi's Hot Points: The American citizen's voice is indeed "missing" from the larger discussions on health reform that get wonky very quickly. I recommend your taking a look into this report -- especially paying attention to the color commentary of the three-city 'tour' of Detroit, Miami, and San Fran. While very different metro communities in terms of demographics, employer base, and economics, they share the concerns of all Americans when it comes to access, cost and quality of health in America. The fact that most Americans appear to be willing to share personal health information with the larger goal of establishing clinical effectiveness and measuring quality for the public's health is a key finding in this analysis that can empower the incoming Obama administration's commitment to bolstering the national health information infrastructure and enabling data-driven health care in the U.S.

4 Comments:

  • Thanks for this post. I'll check out the report in more detail.

    Oddly enough, Doctors want the same thing regarding HIT tools they select to incorporate into their practice: Simple, effective and affordable tools that provide general/detailed guideline-driven information across their patient panel.

    Unfortunately, industry has not given doctors/citizens what they want. Instead, we create complex, expensive systems that crush productivity, take YEARS to deploy and CAN'T provide the practice-wide guideline-driven analysis both require to create a more affordable/effective/informed healthcare system.

    Our singular focus on creating completely paperless offices does more to delay HIT adoption than it does to help. The pursuit of perfection (complex/$$$) retards development of simple and effective techniques/tools that can be used today to improve outcomes and lower costs. Perhaps slashed IT budgets across the country will reverse this trend?

    Or atleast, that is my opinion...

    THANKS for your blog.

    By Anonymous Alex Burgess, At January 7, 2009 9:29 AM  

  • Thank you for highlighting the findings of our report on your blog. As one of the principal authors of the report and the person who put in much of the leg work behind the town hall tour I can only echo your reactions.

    It was amazing to see people reveal their very personal interactions with the health care system and come together as a community behind ideas for reform. If you get a chance, please check out the highlights video and webcasts of the town hall events. There is a particularly poignant comment by Donna Shalala towards the end of the Miami town hall that sums things up.

    By Blogger drob, At January 7, 2009 11:05 AM  

  • Jane...terrific post as usual! You said at one point that "2 in 3 see value in submitting their data into an anonymized database for mining clinical effectiveness information." I'm wondering if you've got a reference for this, it would help me enormously.
    Thanks!

    By Anonymous Glenn Laffel, At January 13, 2009 7:56 AM  

  • Glenn, please see the lower half of page 14 for the statistic. Thanks for reading the details! JSK

    By Blogger Jane Sarasohn-Kahn, At January 13, 2009 4:16 PM  

Post a Comment



<< Home