With the stunning Supreme Court 5-4 majority decision to uphold the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), there’s a Roberts’ Rules of (Health Reform) Order that calls for liberating primary care beyond the doctors’ office. That’s because a strategic underpinning of the ACA is akin to President Herbert Hoover’s proverbial “chicken in every pot:” for President Obama, the pronouncement is something like, “a medical home for every American.”

But insurance for all doesn’t equate to access: because 32-some million U.S. health citizens buy into health insurance plans doesn’t guarantee every one of them access to a doctor. There’s a primary care shortage in much of America — the American Academy of Family Physicians estimates that the number of primary care doctors fell 52% since 1997. In raw number terms, 1 in 5 people in the U.S. lack a primary care home, with a shortage of 90,000 projected for 2020 — 8 years from today. That’s not enough time to train that number of physicians, even with the incentives to attract new primary care providers (PCPs) included in the ACA.

The solution? Liberate primary care in several ways, as I detailed in my paper, Primary Care, Everywhere, commissioned by the California HealthCare Foundation in November 2011.

Why the hub-bub around primary care? Because the world over, those nations that spend most cost-effectively on health care are those with the strongest primary care backbones. By ensuring that each health citizen has a patient-centered medical home, a country can avoid duplication, inefficiency, and high-cost care driven by specialists and others used inappropriately for the wrong patient at the wrong time and place. The PCP, coupled with the electronic health record, can track and manage population health and drive better outcomes for people, while neither over-treating or under-treating. That’s the theory.

Without sufficient PCPs, the solution is team-based care, where the medical home can be the central locus of care but with delivery of that care accomplished by a team that works with the physician: nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nutritionists, diabetes educators, and others affiliated in that practice. But then in the larger community, there are many other hubs of primary care that complement the medical home: most notably, the pharmacy, the worksite clinic, retail health clinics, school-based clinics, Federally Qualified Health Centers (which can function as medical homes), fitness and rehab facilities, and the much-overlooked actual home of the patient.

A team-based approach breaks down siloes, and opens up the supply side of primary care beyond the PCP-focused model. Furthermore, the decentralized delivery of care brings that care closer to the patient in her community where she “lives, works, plays and prays,” as our Surgeon General Dr. Regina Benjamin says. This approach promotes access, cultural sensitivity, and can bolster patients’ adherence and consistency in self-care — critical for bending the cost curve and avoiding unnecessary admissions through the ER or to the doctor.

How this happens is through realigning incentives — payment, reimbursement, value-based benefit design — that promote the primary care home for every health citizen. In the short-run — and here, in medical education terms, a decade — we must embrace a team-based approach to primary care, underpinned by an electronic health record for each health citizen.

Health Populi’s Hot Points: The undersupply of PCPs requires team-based care: a shared responsibility on the clinical side for treating patients at the right place, right time, with the most appropriately skilled labor. PCPs, at a deficit, must be deployed to their highest and best use: that is, restructuring clinical work processes that ensure PCPs do what they’re trained to do, delegating lesser tasks to appropriately train clinical staff. Where deployed, team-based care has resulted in greater patient, physician and nurse satisfaction, better productivity, improved quality measures and outcomes, and improved bottom-lines.

Team-based care is the modus operandi for accountable care and value-based health plans. It means collaboration: within teams in practices, between teams across practices, and across health industry segments/stakeholders. The accountable care orientation, where payment rewards population health, will require organizations working together who have never before aligned: pharmacy chains with physician practices, worksite clinics liaising with PCPs, diabetes educators and nutritionists with school-based clinics, pharmaceutical and life science companies with patient advocates and caregivers, health plans with remote health monitoring/telehealth companies. This is the new primary care, everywhere.

5 Comments on Why we now need primary care, everywhere

HealthPopuli.com said : Guest Report 3 years ago

[…] In addition to a relatively high level of avoidable mortality in America, the U.S. also has the lowest level of universal coverage for a core set of health care services compared with the 35 other OECD countries. That core set of services covers consultations with doctors, tests and examinations, along with inpatient hospital care. In the U.S., Americans have relatively less access to a doctor when care is needed, the OECD report revealed. [The primary care “backbone” in the U.S. isn’t as comprehensive as in other developed countries, which is one of the major differences between American health care delivery and organization versus other countries that spend less on medical care and achieve much better outcomes, which I’ve discussed here in Health Populi].  […]

HealthPopuli.com said : Guest Report 6 years ago

[…] up the OECD nations’ health systems can attest. Our wealthy nation-colleagues have much stronger primary care backbones than America’s, and they spend far less money on healthcare services. What they do spend more on than the U.S., […]

Diagnosis: Acute Health Care Angst In America - Health Populi said : Guest Report 7 years ago

[…] goals. Every developed country with better public health outcomes than America’s have strong primary care backbones and universal consumer access to that PCP on-ramps. The good news for both consumers, providers and […]

Democratizing Health IT – it’s National Health IT Week | Health Populi said : Guest Report 10 years ago

[...] These private sector representatives told personal stories about their own health challenges and how access to data made a difference in their lives. Cerner’s Clay Patterson talked about the company working in the community, partnering with churches on health issues. This prompted a panelist to talk about neighborhoods as a locus for health care — something Health Populi often talks about in the mantra that health is where people “live, work, play and pray.”  [...]

Tom Gledhill said : Guest Report 11 years ago

Great article, Jane. A couple of comments: 1. Most organiztions leverage their highly trained and skilled personnel by employing several less skilled personnel benrath her/him. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research & quality (AHRQ) there were a total of 85,657 non-physician providers (Nurse Practitioners + Physicain Assistants) and 209,000 physicians practicing Primary Care. What we need are more Nurse Practitioners to practice independently (in collaboration with a physician) and more Physician Assistants to help make the physician more productive. 2. My company developed and marketed an EMR in the nineties. The market was not ready for it. Small practices couldn't justify the price. Doctors had a hard time adapting to the new technology and they didn't feel that it was worth the effort. I'm hearing a lot of the same stuff today, almost 20 years later plus the privacy issue. The bottom line - universal computerization of the medical record will happen. It will just take longer than most people think.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked