More U.S. employers are growing activist roles as stakeholders in the healthcare system, according to the 2019 Large Employers Health Care Strategy and Plan Design Survey from the National Business Group on Health (NBGH).

Consider the Amazon-Berkshire Hathaway-JPMorgan Chase link up between Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffet, and Jamie Dimon, as the symbol of such employer-health activism.

The NBGH report is based on survey results collected from 170 large employers representing 13 million workers and 19 million covered lives (families/dependents). This annual survey is one of the most influential such reports released each year, providing a current snapshot of large employers’ views on healthcare, costs, and strategic options that will enable companies to continue providing health insurance to workers. The study was fielded in May-June 2018 and represents actions that employers will take in 2019 for health benefits, Brian Marcotte, President and CEO of NBGH, explained this morning during a press conference launching the report.

For 2019, employers look to their overall healthcare strategy, first, to bolster a productive, competitive, engaged workforce, and then second, to manage costs.

But managing to the Triple Aim — that is, enhancing healthcare experience, driving outcomes, and lowering per capita costs — is still a goal of employers, which underpins their activism. One-third of large employers will adopt new delivery and payment models like accountable care organizations and high-performing networks in 2019. More employers will also channel employees and dependents to Centers of Excellence for focused clinical areas like cancer treatment, cardiovascular care. orthopedic/musculoskeletal, and fertility.

Behavioral health is gaining traction among large employers, growing anti-stigma campaigns and manager training focusing on mental health conditions and treatments.

One of the most concerning rising cost components in medical trend come from the pharmaceutical supply chain. Large employers identified the key drivers of cost trend:  high-cost claims and conditions, and specialty pharmacy costs. The second chart summarizes large employers’ views on prescription drug costs, as employers are looking for greater transparency and a new business model that simplifies and streamlines the chain to lower costs. The vast majority of employers do not believe the current rebate-based system works to reduce pharmaceutical costs, and most welcoming an alternative to rebates. Specifically, over half of employers don’t see that rebates benefit patients at the point-of-sale. As a result, 30% of employers will implement co-pay accumulator programs in 2019, and Marcotte expects this to accelerate to as much as 50% within a few years.

Health Populi’s Hot Points:  One part of the NBGH survey asked employers about the impact of mergers and consolidation in the industry, along with so-called “new entrants” — such as technology companies, retailers, and organizations that typically haven’t served the legacy healthcare system. Here, consider Lyft and Uber, grocery stores, and of course, the multiple health/care strategies of Amazon, Apple, and Google.

70% of employers said these new market entrants will be necessary to disrupt the market in a positive way.

This vision is supported by large employers’ viewing positive impacts of virtual care and artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare delivery, shown in the first chart. 65% of employers see that virtual care — telehealth, telemedicine, remote monitoring, and  cognitive behavioral therapy, for example — will have a significant impact on healthcare delivery. 71% of employers see AI having a significant impact on healthcare.

These findings show a more empowered, engaged employer in America. My hypothesis is that, as I continue to evangelize about the “Amazon Prime-ing” of the health care consumer, employers are also these people, looking to the tech-based platforms and solutions and apps that enable all of us to streamline our lives for travel, for grocery shopping, for way-finding, and for financial transactions. Why not for healthcare, channeled through our workplaces?

One other finding in the survey stood out: that some employers are “dialing back” full replacement of consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs). For the first time in four years, employers have begun to offer at least one other option of a plan beyond a CDHP (high-deductible plan, coupled with a health savings account). This may be “bringing choice back in,” Marcotte observed, in companies’ battle for talent acquisition.

Employers may also be recognizing the fact that the consumer-employee is also the payor, and as such, customer experience through both virtual and convenient care options, and transparency that empowers a worker to make rational choices based on their own value and values, will help transform both health plan design and an engaged workforce. “Our health system was not was not designed with the consumer in mind,” Marcotte observed. The 2019 NBGH survey shows that large employers are becoming more design-thinking when it comes to health benefits, a welcome phenomenon.

2 Comments on Employers Take on Health Activism, Embracing Behavioral Health, Virtual Care, AI, and Transparency

Tiffany Locke said : Guest Report a month ago

It's great that this article talks about how virtual care has been shown to have a beneficial impact on healthcare delivery. This would be a great way to ensure that people are able to get the appointments and help they need whenever they have a problem. If a company or service wants to use this option, they'd probably want to find doctors, clinics, and other healthcare options that specializes in the type of care they need, such as virtual mental health services, so they have the technology, experience, and knowledge to help things go smoothly and keep their patients healthy. http://virtualpsychiatryforhousestaff.com/

Pramod John said : Guest Report 4 months ago

Thanks for the comments. Knowing Brian and the NBGH crew, I love the numbers about their employers believing in change and that new entrants are necessary. The number one reason why rebates and the current system exists is because the same employers keep writing checks to the same people they claim are the problem. They also don't understand the economics of the industry, so it would be quite hard for them to recognize the 'new' solution that they are looking for. The problem isn't the lack of alternative solutions, the problem is that the current decision makers are unwilling to do anything. If nothing else Bezos/Dimon/Buffet's message is that everyone below them has been asleep at the wheel. The best way to change the industry is to wake up and do something and filling our surveys doesn't count.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked